Resize an image to exact pixels
Set the width and height you need. The work happens on your device — the image is never uploaded.
Drop an image here, or click to choose one
You can also paste a screenshot with Ctrl+V. JPG, PNG, WebP.
Every byte of that work happened on your own machine. Verify it: open DevTools → Network, and use the tool. No request carries your image, because none is made.
Dimensions and file size are different problems
People reach for a resizer and a compressor interchangeably, but they solve different constraints. Dimensions are about how many pixels exist — what a form measures when it says "at least 600 × 750". File size is about how many bytes those pixels take to describe, which depends on the image's content as much as its size. A form can demand both, and the two requirements can pull against each other.
When they do, the order matters: resize first, then compress. Reducing dimensions removes information cheaply and cleanly. Compressing first and then resizing means the encoder spends its budget preserving detail you are about to throw away, and the artefacts it introduced get scaled up along with everything else.
What quality survives a resize
Reducing size is nearly free in visual terms — averaging four pixels into one loses information you were not going to see anyway, and often looks sharper than the original because it hides noise. Increasing size is not free and cannot be made so. There is no algorithm that recovers detail that was never recorded; enlargement can only guess, and guessing produces softness or, worse, plausible-looking texture that was not there.